Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor.

Auteur(s) :
Harris JL., Kirkpatrick SI., Reedy J., Kahle LL., Ohri - Vashaspati ., Krebs - Smith .
Date :
Avr, 2014
Source(s) :
Public health nutrition. #17:4 p924-31
Adresse :
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Boulevard, EPN 4005, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. [email protected]

Sommaire de l'article
Imprimer

OBJECTIVE
To evaluate five popular fast-food chains' menus in relation to dietary guidance.

DESIGN
Menus posted on chains' websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids' menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed.

SETTING
Five popular fast-food chains in the USA.

SUBJECTS
Not applicable.

RESULTS
Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids' menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points.

CONCLUSIONS
The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.

Source : Pubmed
Retour