Guide to health: nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an internet-based intervention in churches

Auteur(s) :
Winett RA., Anderson ES., Wojcik JR., Winett SG., Bowden T.
Date :
Mai, 2007
Source(s) :
Ann Behav Med.. #33:3 p251-61
Adresse :
Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. rswinett@vt.edu

Sommaire de l'article

BACKGROUND: Theory-based interventions accessible to large groups of people are needed to induce favorable shifts in health behaviors and body weight. PURPOSE: The aim was to assess nutrition; physical activity; and, secondarily, body weight in the tailored, social cognitive Guide to Health (GTH) Internet intervention delivered in churches. METHODS: Participants (N = 1,071; 33% male, 23% African American, 57% with body mass index > or = 25, 60% sedentary, Mdn age = 53 years) within 14 Baptist or United Methodist churches were randomized to the GTH intervention only (GTH-Only; 5 churches), with church-based supports (GTH-Plus; 5 churches), or to a waitlist (control; 4 churches). Verified pedometer step counts, measured body weight, fat, fiber, and fruit and vegetable (F&V) servings from food frequency and supermarket receipts were collected at pretest, posttest (7 months after pretest), and follow-up (16 months after pretest). RESULTS: Participants in GTH-Only increased F&V at post (approximately 1.50 servings) compared to control (approximately 0.50 servings; p = .005) and at follow-up (approximately 1.20 vs. approximately 0.50 servings; p m = .038) and increased fiber at post (approximately 3.00 g) compared to control (approximately 1.5 g; p = .006) and follow-up (approximately 3.00 g vs. approximately 2.00 g; p = .040). GTH-Plus participants compared to control increased steps at post (approximately 1,500 steps/day vs. approximately 400 steps/day; p = .050) and follow-up (approximately 1,000 steps/day vs. approximately – 50 steps/day; p = .010), increased F&V at post (approximately 1.5 servings; p = .007) and follow-up (approximately 1.3 servings; p = .014), increased fiber at post (approximately 3.00A g; p = .013), and follow-up (approximately 3.00; p = .050) and decreased weight at post (approximately – 0.30 kg vs. approximately + 0.60 kg; p = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to control, both GTH treatments improved nutrition at posttest, but church supports improved physical activity and nutrition at posttest and follow-up, suggesting environmental supports may improve Internet-based interventions.

PMID: 17600452 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Source : Pubmed
Retour