Messages promoting genetic modification of crops in the context of climate change: Evidence for psychological reactance.

Auteur(s) :
Lu H., McComas KA., Besley JC.
Date :
Jan, 2017
Source(s) :
Appetite. #108 p104-116
Adresse :
Department of Communication, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States. Electronic address: hl896@cornell.edu.

Sommaire de l'article

Genetic modification (GM) of crops and climate change are arguably two of today's most challenging science communication issues. Increasingly, these two issues are connected in messages proposing GM as a viable option for ensuring global food security threatened by climate change. This study examines the effects of messages promoting the benefits of GM in the context of climate change. Further, it examines whether explicit reference to "climate change," or "global warming" in a GM message results in different effects than each other, or an implicit climate reference. An online sample of U.S. participants (N = 1050) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: "climate change" cue, "global warming" cue, implicit cue, or control (no message). Generally speaking, framing GM crops as a way to help ensure global food security proved to be an effective messaging strategy in increasing positive attitudes toward GM. In addition, the implicit cue condition led to liberals having more positive attitudes and behavioral intentions toward GM than the "climate change" cue condition, an effect mediated by message evaluations.

Source : Pubmed
Retour