The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program.

Auteur(s) :
Brown HS., Kelder SH., Perez-lopez AJ., Hoelscher DM., Li YP., Rivera R.
Date :
Oct, 2007
Source(s) :
INT J BEHAV NUTR PHYS ACT. #4(1) p47
Adresse :
Division of Management, Policy and Community Health, University of Texas School of Public Health, Austin, TX 78701, USA. henry.s.brown@uth.tmc.edu.

Sommaire de l'article

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This study assesses the net benefit and the cost-effectiveness of the Coordinated Approach to Child Health (CATCH) intervention program, using parameter estimates from the El Paso trial. There were two standard economic measures used. First, from a societal perspective on costs, cost-effectiveness ratios (CER) were estimated, revealing the intervention costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved. QALY weights were estimated using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Second, the net benefit (NB) of CATCH was estimated, which compared the present value of averted future costs with the cost of the CATCH intervention. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES) and NHANES follow-up data, we predicted the number of adult obesity cases avoided for ages 40-64 with a lifetime obesity progression model. RESULTS: The results show that CATCH is cost-effective and net beneficial. The CER was US$900 (US$903 using Hispanic parameters) and the NB was US$68,125 (US$43,239 using Hispanic parameters), all in 2004 dollars. This is much lower than the benchmark for CER of US$30,000 and higher than the NB of US$0. Both were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Childhood school-based programs such as CATCH are beneficial investments. Both NB and CER declined when Hispanic parameters were included, primarily due to the lower wages earned by Hispanics. However, both NB and CER for Hispanics were well within standard cost-effectiveness and net benefit thresholds.

Source : Pubmed
Retour