Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?

Auteur(s) :
Murakami K., Livingstone MB.
Date :
Fév, 2018
Source(s) :
Nutrition journal. #17:1 p27
Adresse :
Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113 0033, Japan. kenmrkm@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Sommaire de l'article

BACKGROUND
While the admittedly limited number of epidemiological findings on the association between diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and diet quality are not always consistent, potential influence of bias in the estimation of diet-related GHGE caused by misreporting of energy intake (EI) has not been investigated. This cross-sectional study evaluated diet-related GHGE in the UK and their association with diet quality, taking account of EI under-reporting.

METHODS
Dietary data used were from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008/2009-2013/2014, in which 4-day food diaries were collected from 3502 adults aged ≥19 years. Diet-related GHGE were estimated based on 133 food groups, using GHGE values from various secondary sources. Diet quality was assessed by the healthy diet indicator (HDI), Mediterranean diet score (MDS) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score. EI misreporting was assessed as reported EI divided by estimated energy requirement (EI:EER).

RESULTS
Mean value of daily GHGE was 5.7 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO

CONCLUSIONS
With taking account of EI under-reporting, this study showed inverse associations between diet-related GHGE and diet quality not only in the entire sample but also in the separate analyses of plausible reporters and under-reporters, as well as potential underreporting of diet-related GHGE.

Source : Pubmed
Retour